Duties do not match ANZSCO
Reference letters described duties that did not match the claimed occupation code. Most common issue.
Our skilled team Gurjeev Bhalla and Sourabh Aggarwal handles assessment review and reapplication across 189, 190, and 491. Most assessing authorities have internal review processes. Fresh applications with stronger evidence are often viable. Alternative ANZSCO codes sometimes fit better. Here are the practical pathways forward.
Most negative skills assessments cluster around these four issues.
Reference letters described duties that did not match the claimed occupation code. Most common issue.
Qualification assessed as below AQF level required for the occupation. Common for trade and overseas degree applicants.
Required employment period not established, or experience not at skilled level.
Documents not verified or not accepted as genuine. Sometimes fixable; sometimes serious.
The right response depends on the refusal reason.
Fresh applications succeed when specific evidence gaps are closed.
New reference letters from same or former employers. Duties mapped specifically to ANZSCO description. Hours, dates, supervisor details.
Payslips, group certificates, tax records. Independent verification of employment.
If the original application failed, resubmitting the same evidence rarely works. Each new application needs meaningful new content.
With rewritten references, clearer duties mapping, and supporting evidence, many initial refusals become positive assessments. The key is understanding why the original application failed and directly addressing it, not just reapplying with minor edits.
For refused skills assessment strategy, book with Gurjeev Bhalla.