Points claim disputes
Department disallowed claimed points for English, work experience, qualifications, or partner skills. Re-evidencing the claim is the path forward.
Understanding which category your appeal falls into shapes the evidence strategy and the likelihood of success. Our skilled migration specialist Gurjeev Bhalla handles skilled appeals across all three scenarios.
Most skilled appeals turn on one of these three areas. Each has its own evidence requirements.
Department disallowed claimed points for English, work experience, qualifications, or partner skills. Re-evidencing the claim is the path forward.
Department disagreed with or ignored the skills assessment finding. Fresh assessment or detailed submissions needed.
Occupation removed from the CSOL during processing, or ANZSCO code mismatch. Specialist occupation analysis required.
Some appeals combine all three. Comprehensive strategy covers each on its own terms.
Points disputes are usually documentary. Fresh evidence addressing the Department concerns turns appeals around.
Where the issue is with the skills assessment or occupation list, the appeal becomes more technical.
Assessing authorities (TRA, VETASSESS, ACS) can issue fresh assessments with additional evidence. Admissible at ART.
Where the Department and applicant disagree on the ANZSCO code, detailed duties analysis and submissions supporting the claimed code.
Where the occupation was on the CSOL at invitation but removed by decision, submissions on what list governs the decision.
The underlying case is often sound; the evidence at original application was incomplete. ART appeals give applicants a structured opportunity to close the gaps. This is why skilled appeals have strong success rates when prepared properly.
For skilled ART appeals, book with Gurjeev Bhalla.