The applicant (parent)
Must be the parent of an Australian citizen, PR, or eligible NZ citizen. Must pass the Balance of Family test. Must meet health and character requirements. Must have an approved sponsor.
Bringing your parents to Australia permanently is one of the most rewarding migration decisions a family can make. It is also, for the Subclass 103, one of the longest waits in the entire Australian migration system. This page tells you honestly what to expect, and what alternatives (like the Subclass 143 and the Subclass 870) might work better for your family.
The 103 is a permanent parent visa. The sponsor must be an Australian citizen, permanent resident, or eligible New Zealand citizen, and must be the child of the applicant. The visa grants permanent residency on approval. The caveat is the wait.
Must be the parent of an Australian citizen, PR, or eligible NZ citizen. Must pass the Balance of Family test. Must meet health and character requirements. Must have an approved sponsor.
Must be an Australian citizen, PR, or eligible NZ citizen. Must usually be the parent's child (biological, step, or adopted). Usually settled in Australia for 2 years. Must commit to sponsor obligations.
Called "non-contributory" because the application fee and Assurance of Support bond are much lower than for the Subclass 143. Real financial benefit, traded off against very long processing times.
It determines whether you can apply at all. If you fail this test, no parent visa category is open to you. We assess it as the first thing at the consultation.
The 103 has historically had wait times of 30+ years. These are not processing delays. They reflect the annual planning cap on parent visa places set by the Government. The Department of Home Affairs publishes current wait estimates.
If both applicants are healthy middle-aged parents, the 103 may still be viable. The wait is long but the applicants will still be alive and well at the end of it.
If applicants are elderly or have health concerns, the 143 contributory stream (with its much shorter wait) is usually a better choice.
The fees and AoS bond are significantly lower. For families where parents are relatively young and the child in Australia is not in a financial position for the 143, the 103 is sometimes the only realistic option.
Often exceeding 20 to 30 years for the non-contributory pathways. This is not a processing failure. It is the result of an annual cap on how many parent visas can be granted each year, set by the Government's migration planning levels. The only way to significantly shorten the wait is to use the contributory stream (Subclass 143).
The AoS bond and the health requirement are where parent visa applications often get stuck.
The sponsor provides an AoS. Financial commitment backed by a bond. For the 103, the bond is lower than the 143. Ensures the parent will not rely on certain Australian social security payments.
For older applicants, health exams often turn up conditions that trigger the significant cost test. A health waiver may be needed. Handled by Prateek Maan.
Applicants aged 16+ need police clearances from every country lived in for 12+ months over the past 10 years. For older applicants who have lived in multiple countries, gathering these takes time.
For an honest assessment of your parent visa options, book with Neha Sharma.