Legal error only
Court looks for jurisdictional error in the ART decision. Factual disagreement alone is not enough.
When the Administrative Review Tribunal affirms a visa refusal, the Federal Circuit Court is the next step. But judicial review is narrower than many applicants expect. Our immigration lawyer Prateek Maan (admitted VIC and QLD) handles Federal Circuit judicial review.
Federal Circuit Court review is fundamentally different from ART review.
Court looks for jurisdictional error in the ART decision. Factual disagreement alone is not enough.
Unlike ART appeals, the Federal Circuit does not receive new evidence. It reviews the existing ART record for legal error.
Must be filed within 35 days of the ART decision. Extensions possible in narrow circumstances.
If successful, the Court sets aside the ART decision and remits the matter for fresh ART review. Court does not grant the visa.
Most successful Federal Circuit applications identify errors in these categories.
Federal Circuit matters follow a consistent process over several months.
Application filed at the Federal Circuit Court registry. Court fees payable.
Directions hearings, filing of submissions, evidence of the record. Typically 6-9 months to hearing.
Oral argument before a Federal Circuit judge. Usually one day.
Written judgment within weeks or months. Court sets aside or dismisses.
Judicial review is genuinely harder than ART because the grounds are narrower. Applicants with strong factual claims are often better served by fresh ART applications where available. Judicial review fits where the ART decision was legally flawed, not just unfavourable.
For Federal Circuit judicial review, book with Prateek Maan.